In accordance with the PSC’s letter, their investigation has turned up nothing however examples of AT&T falsely claiming to have created new broadband service in locations they haven’t, for individuals that aren’t receiving broadband entry. Extra particularly, saying you could have offered web entry to 133,000 “places” is extremely imprecise when the purpose is to offer human beings with good service. Contemplating that AT&T has a historical past of taking taxpayer cash to offer broadband and wi-fi companies, only to not do that, and likewise make false claims of getting achieved that, the information out of Mississippi isn’t notably shocking.
The PSC has been pushing the telecom big for extra info concerning their service offering in Mississippi since subpoenaing them in September, demanding “manufacturing of paperwork displaying the number of precise subscribers to AT&T’s fastened wi-fi service inside the 133,000 places the place the corporate claims to have offered service, the variety of complaints filed with the corporate by prospects who’ve taken service and the variety of Mississippians who utilized for fastened wi-fi service primarily based on AT&T’s assertion that it was obtainable and have been later decided to not be in an space lined.”
In 2015, AT&T made a deal with the U.S. government the place they might get nearly half a billion a yr to deliver very meager broadband 10MB service to rural areas. That cash has been pulled from the Join America Fund.
AT&T will get the cash over six years with an choice for a seventh, probably bringing the entire to about $3 billion, according to Multichannel News. AT&T and different carriers getting Join America funding need to deploy Web service to 40 % of funded places by the tip of 2017, 60 % by the tip of 2018, 80 % by the tip of 2019, and to 100% of places by the tip of 2020, the article stated.
For a really very long time now AT&T has argued—someway very efficiently—that letting localities or people construct out their very own broadband networks stops the telelcom from taking our tax cash. Critically, they have argued that. AT&T has additionally argued that after they say one factor however do one other factor, like not present broadband service whereas taking federal cash by saying they’ve offered that infrastructure, they haven’t lied or mislead anybody as a result of reporters have investigated them and uncovered them. Critically, they really have argued that.
The FCC has taken out its personal tooth however ending web neutrality protections. Ajit Pai has argued that the FCC can’t regulate the trade that it was created to manage. This, after all, implies that with out a new president and a brand new FCC, any likelihood of getting telecommunications companies to do what they’re supposed to do for most of the people is unlikely.